BipinShantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat, AIR 2001 SC 1158: (2001) 3 SCC 1
- Whenever an objection is raised during evidence taking stage regarding the admissibility of any material or item of oral evidence the trial Court can make a note of such objection and mark the objected document tentatively as an exhibit in the case (or record the objected part of the oral evidence) subject to such objections to be decided at the last stage in the final judgment. If the Court finds at the final stage that the objection so raised is sustainable the Judge or Magistrate can keep such evidence excluded from consideration. In our view there is no illegality in adopting such a course. (However, we make it clear that if the objection relates to deficiency of stamp duty of a document the Court has to decide the objection before proceeding further. For all other objections the procedure suggested above can be followed.)
- The above procedure, if followed, will have two advantages:
First is that the time in the Trial Court, during evidence taking stage, would not be wasted on account of raising such objections and the Court can continue to examine the witnesses. The witnesses need not wait for long hours, if not days.
Second is that the superior Court, when the same objection is re-canvassed and re-considered in appeal or revision against the final judgment of the trial Court, can determine the correctness of the view taken by the Trial Court regarding that objection, without bothering to remit the case to the Trial Court again for fresh disposal. We may also point out that this measure would not cause any prejudice to the parties to the litigation and would not add to their misery or expenses.
- We, therefore, make the above as a procedure to be followed by the Trial Courts whenever an objection is raised regarding the admissibility of any material or any item of oral evidence.