Editorials       Cover Story   Letters
 Subscribe Now  Contact Us
Search  
 
Book Reviews
Case Study
Constitution of India
Cover Story
Crime File
Cyber Space
Good Living
Harvard Law School
Health & Fitness
Permanent Imprint Leading
   Cases
Know Your Judge
The Law and The Celebrity
Legal Articles
Legal Events
Law for Other Species
Law School Confidential
Legal Scanner
Legal Trotternama
Media Scan
Potpourri
Reasoning The Reasons
Street Lawyer
Study Abroad
Supreme Court Cases
Thinkers & Theory
Top Law Schools
Universal Law of Success
--------------- Print Magazine --------------
 
  May 2016
 
  April 2016
 
EDITORIAL - MAY 2016  

Dear Readers,

The Supreme Court, being the last court of appeal, the final interpreter and the supreme guardian of the Constitution apart from being the foremost upholder of the rule of law, carries on it shoulders the humungous load of not only dispensing justice to all those who known at its door but also to hand down just and rational determination of the questions of law that have farreaching consequences across the lenght and breadth of the world's largest democracy.

It goes without saying that it takes substantial time to give each important question of law the attention it deserves before pronouncing a judgement that might potentially affect over 125 milion people and also the generations to come, which makes it imperative for the apex court to have sufficient time and adequate strenght of judges in order to do justice to the huge responsibility it has been shoudlering admirably for all these years despite the limitations within which it has to operate and despite the workload it has to deal witho on daily basis.

The idea of having a National Court of Appeal for the exclusive purpose of adjudicating the appeals arising from the judgements and awards of the High Courts and the tribunals across the country so as to allow the Supreme Court to concentrate better on settling the crucial and intricate issues of the law and of matters involving the interpretation of the Constitution is indeed quite appealing, and the proposed measure if undertaken with due care might result in solving the long standing problem of pendency at the highest judicial level, but it would be better to leave it to the Apex Court to decide when it is the right time for the implementation of the idea.

Manish Arora        

 
LAWYERS UPDATE
(Print Version)
Rs. 600/- per year
(Registered Post & Courier)
     
 

New Releases by UNIVERSAL's

     To avail discounts and for more details write to us at marketing.in@lexisnexis.com

Home     :      About Us     :      Subscribe     :      Advertise With Us    :       Privacy     :      Copyright     :      Feedback     :      Contact Us

Copyright © Universal Book Traders. All material on this site is subject to copyright. All rights reserved.
No part of this material may be reproduced, transmitted, framed or stored in a retrieval system for public or private
use without the written permission of the publisher. This site is developed and maintained by Universal Legal Infosolutions.
Powered by: Universal Book Traders